Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Pot, meet...

I'm perfectly fine making fun of Dion for failing to pay off his leadership debts. But fercrissakes, shouldn't the party making such remarks at least not be guilty of that same sin?

It's like friggin' amateur hour out there. Someone get a cane.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The difference is this is the guy who wants to lead our country. They guy who is supposed to be the exemplar for the rest of his party. God help us if this doofas ever gets the keys to the vault.

Platty said...

So PM Harper, the leader of the CPC, has not paid his debts??

You did say Pot and Kettle didn't you?

Jarrett said...

Okay, you guys are distinguishing on the basis that Dion, the party leader, has not paid off his debts (but Harper has). If it's all about party leadership, fine, but that's not the distinction Pierre made:

And he again suggested that the independent elections watchdog, by granting extensions to the leadership contenders, is turning a blind eye to Liberal illegality.

"What penalty has Elections Canada applied to this breach?" Poilievre asked in the Commons.


Poilievre is attacking Dion on the illegality aspect, violating the rules, whatever you want to call it. He's not being as subtle as you guys are, so your distinction, right or wrong, is really neither here nor there.

Look, I don't hate the Tories or anything, but surely you can wish for something more than blind partisanship?

stageleft said...

Well said.