So... underrepresentation in Parliament becomes a problem when it's Ontario's problem, but not a goddamned minute before!
Let's be clear: ideally, it'd be total rep-by-pop. I understand there are practical considerations - is it really practical to have one MP for every single inch of the territories? - and the Constitutional considerations about no province losing seats.
Still, there's something patently unfair in that BC's capital region, Victoria, has about 2.5 times the population of Prince Edward Island, but only 75% of the seats. Or how PEI has the same population as West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast, but four times the seats. BC's been underrepresented for years, no matter how you slice it. Whatever my personal convictions, that fact means I can only feel so sympathetic.
Friday, November 23, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
McGuinty handled this poorly. And Van Loan responded in kind.
Instead of trying to be genial about it and work towards a full solution, he decided to use pointless rhetoric to attack the federal government. Van Loan responded with equally little tact.
But Harper's government is getting little credit for trying to keep everyone from being too unhappy. Still, no one except the partisans really care about this issue. Harper supporters will see this and say 'look he's doing a fantabulous job'. Liberal partisans will say 'Harper doesn't care about Toronto!'. The rest will yawn.
If Ontario is getting 10 more seats and B.C. 6, and these seats will be in and around Toronto and Vancouver respectively and the Conservatives don't do well in the big cities, then why are the Liberals crying?
Considering how liberals see themselves as dictators and want absolute power, why have they not tried to dissolve parliament when they have had majorities? You have got to wonder. (real conservative)
I guess if you're a Liberal and you never do anything while in power you can't be critisuzed for doing the wrong thing.
Post a Comment